Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa BG 4500X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m

Daiwa BG
Spinning
55.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.83 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank109 centimeter / 42.91 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €117.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/320
Conclusion
Daiwa BG 4500X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and durability (7.83 out of 10). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa BG 4500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa BG?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8.11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74cm / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa BG 4500X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
