Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
67.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) and ball bearings (4+1). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn FIERCE IV 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX
