Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Ultegra?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74cm / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
