Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Sahara 1000 R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, and durabilitymaximum drag. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in ergonomics, while Shimano Sahara 1000 R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Sahara 1000 R?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74cm / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX
