Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona 500 FI clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (3kg / 7 lbs) and ball bearings (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona 500 FI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Sedona 500 FI?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74cm / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 7 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX
