Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m

Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
Spinning
53.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight615g / 21.69oz
Line retireve per crank94cm / 37.00 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.37/275. 0.405/230, 0.47/160 lb/yds: 12/345, 16/250, 20/185
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona 8000 FI clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24.25lbs) and ball bearings (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona 8000 FI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Sedona 8000 FI?
Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24.25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
