Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 6.43 out of 10 (80cm / 31.50 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX
