Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 6.43 out of 10 (80cm / 31.50 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC
