Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
