Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 6.43 out of 10 (80cm / 31.50 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
