Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin HORNET 40X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight340g / 11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/500
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin HORNET 40X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in line retrieve per crank, while Delphin HORNET 40X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin HORNET?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9.17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80cm / 31.50 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Delphin HORNET 40X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X
