Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9.17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX
