Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
67.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) and ball bearings (4+1). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn FIERCE IV 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X
