Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Sahara 500 FI score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, and durabilitymaximum drag. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in line retrieve per crank, while Shimano Sahara 500 FI may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 6.43 out of 10 (80cm / 31.50 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X
