Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Spinning
63.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160 lb/yds: 6/200, 8/140, 10/120
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4kg / 8.82 lbs) and ball bearings (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI?
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
