Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19.84 lbs) and ball bearings (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI?
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19.84 lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Delphin FRIZ vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X
