Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX
