Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
54.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €54.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a line retrieve per crank of 82cm / 32.28 inch, while Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa BG 4500X
