Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
54.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €54.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a line retrieve per crank of 82cm / 32.28 inch, while Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX
