Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a gear ratio of 5.3:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4 kg), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
