Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a gear ratio of 5.3:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4 kg), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX
