Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 39.0 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.5 out of 10 (225g / 7,94oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
