Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 17 Prorex LT?
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX
