Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
72.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX
