Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX
