Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX
