Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
