Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
