Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
