Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
79.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
