Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
