Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
85.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 1500X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X
