Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
85.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX
