Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €99.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX
