Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200
Conclusion
Both Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 8.7 out of 10 (92cm / 36.22 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX
