Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Both Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 8.7 out of 10 (92cm / 36.22 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa BG 1500X
