Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Both Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 8.7 out of 10 (92cm / 36.22 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX
