Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Both Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 8.7 out of 10 (92cm / 36.22 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X
