Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Both Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 8.7 out of 10 (92cm / 36.22 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
