Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125
Conclusion
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (7,4kg / 16,31lbs) and ball bearings (5). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Mitchell MX2 Spinning?
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (7,4kg / 16,31lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.28 out of 10 (258g / 9,1oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Delphin HORNET 40X
