Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Battle III 2000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Penn Battle III
Spinning
74.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.20/220
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 2000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Battle III?
Penn Battle III 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX
