Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and weight (535g / 18,87oz). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- Scoring 8.22 out of 10 (535g / 18,87oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX
