Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and weight (535g / 18,87oz). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.22 out of 10 (535g / 18,87oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
