Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and weight (545g / 19,22oz). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X
