Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Spinning

43.10 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.3:1

Maximum drag-

Weight380g / 13.40oz

Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €19.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF

Spinning

45.30 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.27 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag-

Weight220g / 7.76oz

Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandCORMORAN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €17.00
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180

Conclusion

Both Cormoran Sportline 2PiF and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Cormoran Sportline 2PiF offers a slight edge in weight, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.