Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
71.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €68.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (5). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT?
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
