Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT
Spinning
65.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €73.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (5). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 20 Legalis LT?
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Mitchell 300 4000X
