Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (8). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Stradic FM
