Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
