Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX
