Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
