Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX
