Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
