Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX
