Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
