Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX
