Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
