Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X
