Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX
