Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X
