Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €79.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (5). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC
