Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
84.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X
