Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X
